Author: blass uri
Date: 13:30:02 06/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2000 at 14:58:49, Dann Corbit wrote: >Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------ >Crafty : 2516 16 22 1073 67.3 % 2391 25.4 % >SOS : 2441 25 29 533 60.3 % 2368 21.6 % >Comet : 2431 17 17 1257 56.6 % 2385 23.9 % >LGoliath : 2430 23 19 822 53.4 % 2406 26.5 % >AnMon : 2411 24 20 803 52.4 % 2394 23.4 % >Patzer : 2397 23 29 564 49.7 % 2398 23.6 % >Phalanx : 2396 19 22 943 49.0 % 2403 19.9 % >Gromit3 : 2381 41 34 285 50.7 % 2377 21.4 % >TCBishop : 2378 21 24 768 47.9 % 2392 21.6 % >Amy : 2359 25 36 486 64.6 % 2254 13.6 % >Gromit2 : 2358 25 27 545 44.1 % 2399 24.4 % >Francesca : 2340 24 27 572 45.2 % 2374 25.3 % >ZChess : 2331 21 25 701 47.6 % 2348 23.1 % >Yace : 2327 35 30 367 52.7 % 2308 23.7 % >Bringer : 2311 26 30 499 48.5 % 2321 21.2 % > >Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------ >ArasanX : 2287 37 31 344 51.5 % 2277 20.3 % >LambChop : 2279 41 34 291 38.3 % 2362 19.6 % >Ant : 2256 31 30 436 54.5 % 2225 18.6 % >GnuChess4 : 2256 65 67 99 46.5 % 2280 14.1 % >InmiChess3 : 2245 50 45 187 51.9 % 2232 16.0 % >ExChess3 : 2226 26 32 507 60.4 % 2153 14.2 % >Knightx : 2216 49 57 146 48.6 % 2225 19.2 % >InmiChess2 : 2199 96 76 59 34.7 % 2308 18.6 % >Dragon : 2166 59 36 212 30.0 % 2314 15.6 % >GnuChess5 : 2155 50 66 130 64.2 % 2053 16.2 % >Fortress : 2144 67 68 92 56.0 % 2103 16.3 % >LDBlanche : 2131 57 42 170 34.1 % 2246 20.0 % >Amyan : 2115 57 58 135 47.8 % 2131 9.6 % > >Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------ >Gully2 : 2062 59 64 119 49.6 % 2065 10.1 % >Cilian : 2051 46 40 213 39.0 % 2129 20.7 % >ColChess : 2044 65 69 92 58.2 % 1986 18.5 % >SSEChess : 2010 81 49 114 29.4 % 2163 14.9 % >Sjeng : 2002 48 42 205 40.2 % 2071 17.1 % >Averno : 1992 61 34 239 31.0 % 2131 7.5 % >Freyr : 1946 63 97 83 64.5 % 1843 3.6 % >Crux : 1938 101 96 46 42.4 % 1991 15.2 % >DChess : 1920 77 57 109 39.0 % 1998 6.4 % >NewRival : 1911 87 68 73 35.6 % 2014 16.4 % >Faile : 1899 96 66 76 34.9 % 2007 9.2 % >Monik : 1868 73 78 71 44.4 % 1908 21.1 % >Chessterfield : 1864 65 20 499 19.7 % 2107 4.2 % >TSCP : 1801 52 48 172 42.7 % 1852 13.4 % > >Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >------------- ------ --- --- ---- ------ ---- ------ >Zephyr : 1757 168 79 42 21.4 % 1983 9.5 % >SnailSCP : 1755 234 78 37 12.2 % 2099 8.1 % >Ozwald : 1720 68 66 91 42.3 % 1774 18.7 % >Noonian : 1684 158 47 90 14.4 % 1993 6.7 % >Storm : 1589 142 56 77 22.1 % 1809 2.6 % >LarsenVB : 1565 292 185 11 9.1 % 1965 18.2 % >Golem01 : 1397 242 64 49 8.2 % 1817 8.2 % >Raffaela : 992 0 0 3 0.0 % 1592 0.0 % > >Well, we are drawing close to the wire. Calibration of the bottom programs is >very problematic. Most of them are completely deterministic, and so playing a >set of ten games only produces two distinct games. For instance, I ran 10 >Raffaela games yesterday against TSCP and none of them were different than the >ones already stored. Since I filter for duplicates, the net effect of those ten >games was zero! You can avoid this problem but not using the same time control for different sets of 2 games. I do not see a reason to waste time and repeat games only to get the same result. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.