Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 16:31:05 06/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 2000 at 18:13:26, Fernando Villegas wrote: >Tricky issue is to use the "understanding" word for this kind of problems. Some >tends at once to think of it as something with a human-like kind of >understanding and from then on they say not just one program understand a shit. >But as far my knowledge and experience of CSTAl tell me, this program really >"understand" in the sense it has code lines to tackle these kinds of situations. >That is, in hardware or software realm, understanding. >Fernando Maybe... but since it loses those same kinds of positions more often than it wins them, at least watching it play on ICC, it appears (to me) to simply be 'speculative'. 'Speculative' is only good if it wins...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.