Author: ujecrh
Date: 11:21:52 06/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2000 at 13:58:28, Graham Laight wrote: >I assume that what you're talking about is a database of piece patterns that can >occur in a chess game, together with some indication of what these patterns >mean. > >Unfortunately, when we try to suggest that a NN is the best AI instrument for >abstract pattern recognition, all we seem to hear is that NNs are quite >incapable of being trained to recognise chess patterns - as if the mechanism of >the human brain is some sort of magic... > >-g No, I am aware of the difficulty to apply AI to chess but in this case I was more thinking about position treatment methods. For example JC.Weil has written a paper of pawn endings programming, or Robbert Hyatt has put numerous comments in crafty sources on the way to handle particular schemas (like linked passed pawns for example). Probably "pattern" was not the best word but, being not a native english speaer, I did not find any better. Ujecrh
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.