Author: leonid
Date: 15:46:16 06/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 28, 2000 at 13:58:58, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >On June 28, 2000 at 09:31:38, leonid wrote: > >>On June 28, 2000 at 06:39:09, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >> >>>On June 27, 2000 at 21:24:44, leonid wrote: >>>> >>>>Tom, I am sometime in Chess Club not that much for finding how to write my >>>>program, not even how do it competitive. This I can do alone. This is simple. I >>>>am here mainly to go "gossip" a little bit about chess programming and verify >>>>some parameters in program. Recently it was about "effective branching factor", >>>>raw speed of certain part of my program, and so like. Sometime it is very easy >>>>to find what you are been looking for. Like explanation that I found one day >>>>about "extensions", when I even not knew that they existe. Sometime it is not >>>>so. You can talk to somebody and find more about personality of man that about >>>>data that you need. And what I never, ever expected is that this place is so >>>>serious. You must take special care for using only precise, sacred words. >>>>Otherwise, you will be never understood and left in silence. >>>> >>>>Leonid. >>> >>>Leonid, can you tell me how many seconds your positional logic needs to >>>solve the "metapositions" in a typical chessgame-position? With >>>"metaposition" I mean the "relevant" information in terms of >>>"nodeevaluations" that is "attached" to >>>the original position in terms of searching brute-force with no extensions. >>>This would be very helpful to me. >>> >>>Ralf >>> >>>(friendly) >> >>Just send to me exact position or put it here. Will say you exact NPS. If I >>understood your expressions correctly, you are asking me about nodes/per/second >>when search is done exactly like my program is doing right now. >> >>Computer AMD 400Mhz. Program use no extensions or hash tables. Brute force >>search. Fixed depth. >> >>When I looked into average NPS counter (it count just what you said) and my >>program played against itself for first 50 moves (starting with initial >>position), I had two times numbers: 200000 and 167000 positions/in one second. I >>also remember that when I looked into average NPS (around 6 months ago), for the >>positions that I took from some Chess Revue, it was average 210000 nodes/second >>(or positions/second). >> >>Recently I looked what is number of NPS for minimax. Did this around 2 weeks >>ago. It was between 800000 and 1100000 nodes/second. > >I believe Ralf's post was a joke. > >The fact that you seemed to understand it makes this situation even funnier. > >-Tom Tom, in our life many things sound like joke. Very often they are the same. Leonid.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.