Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:28:54 06/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2000 at 04:04:49, stuart taylor wrote: >On June 28, 2000 at 01:56:53, David Blackman wrote: >>On June 27, 2000 at 00:32:15, stuart taylor wrote: >>> Is it not true that human ratings are lower than computer ratings relative to >>>true standard of play due to the fact that humans make many blunders of the >>>nature that computers do not? >> >>Correct. >> >>It is also true that I make many blunders of the nature that Kasparov does not. >>This is the main reason that his rating is 1200 points higher than mine, IHMO, >>and if truly deserved ratings were used our ratings would actually be much >>closer :-) > >Yes. I know! It can get a little bit complicated. But still, human vs. human >is very different to human vs. calculator. The calculator simply does NOT make >any mistakes which it is not programed to make. All humans DO- in abundance! You are wrong. Programs are full of bugs. Opening books are full of bugs. Algorithms are deficient. Eval functions are deficient. Look at some of the funny gaffes like immobilizing your own pieces that have been recently demonstrated. Computers make plenty of mistakes, *especially* positional ones. Some of them are simply hilarious.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.