Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 21:06:10 06/29/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 29, 2000 at 23:52:17, Pete Galati wrote: >On June 29, 2000 at 22:56:09, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On June 29, 2000 at 22:00:45, Pete Galati wrote: >> >>>Saying things like "If you still don't like how the situation was handled..." is >>>just a convenient excuse to not change anything about the wasy you're doing >>>anything. >> >>I don't know if you're accusing me personally of this behavior or all of the >>moderators. > >No, not at all, but I keep hearing similar ways to reason around a problem. >It's the old, I was elected so I can do anything I want to, and it's justified >because you voted me in. So saying something like "If you still don't like how >the situation was handled...", that doesn't really fly with me. It doesn't end >arguements, it only starts them with me. You have to understand the purpose of the comment. I am not kicking back on my Barcalounger and saying, "ah, screw it, I don't feel like dealing with moderation issues." As I see things, your issue has been dealt with. You think it was handled wrong and I'm sorry for that. But I'm not going to change anything simply because you keep complaining. Saying "elect somebody else" is much more polite than saying "deal with it and shut up." Because what else am I supposed to say? If you camp out at McDonald's and constantly complain that the prices are too high, they will not lower their prices. They will call the cops. -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.