Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:41:31 06/30/00
Go up one level in this thread
On June 30, 2000 at 01:21:54, Vincent Vega wrote: >On June 29, 2000 at 23:13:52, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On June 29, 2000 at 20:11:57, ujecrh wrote: >> >>> >>>This is the first time in 7 years that I take part to a moderation thread >>>because I am very disapointed here. Not about this particular moderation but >>>about this rule in CCC (that I was not aware of) which forces people to identify >>>themselves. >> >> >>Sorry, but it is a _good_ policy. Anonymous posters can get away with saying >>anything they want with no fear of reprisal of any kind. What about those of >>use that use our _real_ name? Do we have to put up with nonsense with no way >>to stop it? > >So they can say anything they want without a fear of reprisal. This is called >freedom of speech. When did this become a bad thing? You don't have any right >not to be offended. > You are dead wrong. I have a constitutional right to freedom from malicious lies. You have the freedom to say whatever you want, so long as what you say doesn't walk over someone else's freedom. But when you use your freedom to make false or misleading statements, you quickly discover that you are on the wrong side of the legal system. This is a common problem... your right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness ends at the point where it interferes with someone else's rights to the same thing.. >I believe that anybody using a real name on a public Internet forum must place >no value on his privacy. I would advise everybody that does that to just >remember that _everything_ you post will be recorded _forever_ and viewable by >_anyone_. > >> >>In another 5 years there won't be any 'anonymous internet users'. The public >>simply won't stand for it much longer. >> > > >In another 5 years there will many more ways to use the Internet anonymously. >Look at initiatives like FreeNet. Look at popularity of encryption. Look at >uproar over web sites that track users or send out private data. Every major >message board I've seen allows handles and more and more people use them. The >"public" is more bothered by the lack of privacy than by what some anonymous >poster is saying and rightly so. > >If somebody doesn't want to hear what an anonymous poster is saying, the right >solution is technological, through personal preferences, not through wholesale >censorship. Sites like Slashdot have the system for that already in place so >there isn't even any need to reinvent the wheel. If something illegal is said, >the "real name" used with the posts here is so easy to fake that it won't make >any difference in the court. The judge will have to subpoena icdchess' records >to get the IP number and ISP's records to get the poster's identity anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.