Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:21:51 07/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2000 at 10:38:02, Jon Dart wrote: >On July 01, 2000 at 00:53:51, Pete Galati wrote: > >>>Three Crown division: >>>Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >>>-------------- ---- --- --- ----- ------ ----- ------- >>>ArasanX : 2285 37 31 344 51.5 % 2275 20.3 % >>>LambChop : 2277 41 34 291 38.3 % 2360 19.6 % >>>GnuChess4 : 2255 65 67 99 46.5 % 2280 14.1 % >>>Ant : 2253 31 28 464 52.9 % 2233 19.2 % >>>InmiChess3 : 2237 41 46 215 47.7 % 2253 17.2 % >>>ExChess3 : 2225 26 28 564 56.5 % 2180 15.4 % >>>Knightx : 2205 50 48 174 43.1 % 2253 17.2 % >>>Dragon : 2163 59 36 212 30.0 % 2310 15.6 % >>>GnuChess5 : 2154 50 66 130 64.2 % 2052 16.2 % >>>Fortress : 2143 67 68 92 56.0 % 2101 16.3 % >>>LDBlanche : 2122 55 42 176 35.2 % 2228 19.3 % >>>Amyan : 2084 50 55 166 55.7 % 2044 7.8 % >>> >>>My predicted winner: ArasanX >>>My predicted sleepers: Gnuchess5 (calibrated with the wrong version -- MUCH >>>stronger than the numbers indicate) InmiChess & ExChess are also strong. >> >>I think Lamb Chop is the most dangerous program in this group. >> > >LambChop is a respectable program. However I assume the version in >this tourney is the one that's been available for public download. The >version playing on ICC is stronger but I don't think it's public. I agree with your assessment. Furthermore, most of the calibration games from ArasanX were using 5.3. If 5.4 is stronger (and it looks to me like it is) then the rating is higher than indicated.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.