Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:35:27 07/01/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 01, 2000 at 11:48:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On July 01, 2000 at 11:24:35, Daniel Chancey wrote: > >>I agree that CMQueen+ isn't the best personality out there. I've started >>another 30 min tournament that involves CMQTest, Liam, CMQueen++, and a few >>Grandmasters which appears to be weak. >> >>Castle2000 > >Is this the simple reason why you continue to use CMQueen+ instead of the >Stronger CMQueen++ settings, simply because you have been searching for almost >5 weeks with more than 10 of your Tests settings, but finally when I found the >strongest settings for CMQueen++, you simply refuse to include it whenever one >of your Test settings is involved. You probably figured that this is the best >way to win the 2000 Chessmaster personalities championship, by including the >weakest of my settings and refusing to include the strongest, which is the >CMQueen++. > I have a better suggestion, why don't you remove CMBendorz, and CMNimzo 732 from this tournament, not to mentioned you already decided not to use the best settings which is CMQueen++. Just simply match all of your Tests settings with no other strong settings at all, and one of your settings will definitively win the tournament. >Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.