Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Dr. Hyatt is right about chess programs not being GM level.

Author: blass uri

Date: 10:15:36 07/01/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 01, 2000 at 12:55:00, Dave Gomboc wrote:

>On July 01, 2000 at 12:21:51, Adrien Regimbald wrote:
>
>>Hey,
>>
>>>Chinook is better at checkers than anything else on the planet -- by a wide
>>>margin.
>>
>>
>>Anything _alive_ yes :P  The issue of Marion is one yet undecided - and I'm not
>>sure that Chinook could have beat him at his best, but we will never know that
>>now though .. however, it is clear that Chinook is the best checkers "player"
>>currently on the planet.  That being said, Chinook may be better than every
>>other player, but it didn't demonstrate complete dominance - the top human
>>players can still beat it once in a while :P
>>
>>Hmm, wait a minute.. we haven't asked the wombats.. :P
>>
>>
>>Adrien.
>
>Dr. Tinsley '94 and Chinook '94 were about equal.  It's tough to compare Dr.
>Tinsley '57 and Chinook '00 though.
>
>I don't know why you say that the top human players can still beat it once in a
>while.  Please cite the game.  My understanding is that it hasn't lost a game
>since the last time Tinsley beat it.  It has since clobbered both the reigning
>human world checkers champion and the reigning human world correspondence
>checkers champion.  We're talking +8 -0 =12 types of scores, and checkers is
>much more drawish than chess.
>
>Dave

What is the information that you are based on when you say that checkers is much
more drawish than chess.

Do the best players have more draws in checkers?

I read some years ago that chinook had a lot of draws because of the style of
the machine and that the result was 2:1 and 67 draws if my memory is correct.

I suspect that one of the reason that chinook could win humans in checkers is
the fact that this game is less popular than chess so humans know it less.

The game of checkers is also more simple than chess(the number of the legal
positions is clearly smaller because the pieces can be only in 50 squares when
in chess there are 64 squares and there are only 2 kind of pieces for every
player).

The fact that the game is more simple help the machine to get better result and
I wonder if modified chinook can win 12*12 checkers against the best humans when
every side begins with 30 pieces(in this case I believe that the game is not
more simple than chess).

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.