Author: Paulo Soares
Date: 19:37:08 07/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 02, 2000 at 09:06:57, blass uri wrote: >On July 02, 2000 at 07:14:10, Paulo Soares wrote: > ><snipped> >>Main differences: >> >>1. The chosen move is different. >>2. In the analyses placed by Chessfun after the depth 15 appears the depth 17, >> while in the analyses that I placed after the depth 15, appears the depth 18. >possible explanation: >1)You have different tablebases so your Junior chose different move > >2)Your computer is faster so Junior stops to do jumps of 3 faster(at least it is >the case if I compare between Junior on pentium200 and Junior on pIII450) > >Junior on pentium200 can have depthes:3,6,9,12,15,17 when Junior on >pentiumIII450 can have depthes:3,6,9,12,15,18,20(It is the case for previous >versions of Junior and I do not have Junior6 or Junior6a) > >Another possible explanation is that the analysis of sarah was at faster time >control(if you tell Junior to analyze at 2 minutes per move it starts to do >small jumps faster than the case you tell it 5 hours per move) > >Uri You are right, I made the test with 2Min/move(I was using time=10000sec/move, without tablebases from Junior6 CD). It seems that with Infinite analyses Junior also do small jumpers (see my post to Chessfun). I didn't still understand because Junior changes Qh8+ for Qe5+, but I already saw that a lot of times, mainly when you change for the Infinite analyses mode (also with others programs that have Inf. Analysis mode). Paulo
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.