Author: blass uri
Date: 23:24:11 07/02/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 03, 2000 at 01:30:17, blass uri wrote: <snipped> >After the game I tried to give hiarcs the position before 43.Bxb6 and was >surprised to find that it can see that 43.Bxb6 is losing at depth 9 and also can >find 43.Qe8 in less than 4 minutes I tested Hiarcs7.32 with selectivity=7 and was surprised to find that it can find 43.Qe8 even faster. Selectivity=7 also can see at the same time control that I tested the default hiarcs after the game(1 hour/40 move+3 hours/40 moves that means 4 hours for moves 42-80) that 42.axb4 is bad at depth 10(the main line begin with axb4 Bxb4 and 42.axb4 failed low at depth 10). It seems that hiarcs is less selective with selectivity=7 because it can see at the same depth things that the default cannot see. I have 2 questions about hiarcs. 1)Is learning off better than learning on? 2)Is selectivity=6 or 7 better than selectivity=5? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.