Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CMQueen++ vs CMExtra AMD K6-2 500 Mhz G/60 W1 D1

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 18:39:07 07/03/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 03, 2000 at 21:25:34, walter irvin wrote:

>On July 03, 2000 at 19:48:01, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>After two games CMQueen++

>where can i find the settings for cmqueen++ and cmextra  ?????? and are they
>better than cm settings ???
>
>Irving.

If you go to the bottom of this message Board and Click where it say Click here
for the next group of messages, then go the the bottom of that page and you will
see the my CMQueen++ settings under the tittle for Arturo Ochoa. The answer to
your question " are they better than CM Settings ??? My answer is CMQueen++
settings so far is better than any other settings that I have seen posted here.

Pichard.

> is winning the tiny match. Here is one of the shortest
>>draw that I have seen so far. Even if CMQueen++ win by a large margin
>>of more than 1.5 points at this time control, it is not accurate enough to
>>indicate that it is stronger than CMExtra, but at least by posting a few games
>>with these settings you can go over them by using both of these settings and
>>evaluate the quality of the moves.
>>
>>[White " CMExtra " ]
>>[Black " CMQueen++ " ]
>>[Result " 1/2 " ]
>>[Time Control " G/60 " ]
>>
>>1.e4 c6  2.d4 d5  3.Nc3 dxe4  4. Nxe4 Bf5  5.Ng3 Bg6  6.Bc4 e6  7.N1e2 Nf6
>>8.Nf4 Bd6  9.Bb3 Nbd7  10.Qf3 Qc7  11.0-0 c5  12.c3 a5  13.Nxg6 axg6  14.Ba4 0-0
>>15.Rd1 cxd4  16.cxd4 Nb6  17.Bb5 Nbd5  18.a4 Qc2  19.Rd2 Qc7  20.Rd1 Qc2
>>21.Rd2 Qc7  22.Rd1 0.5 0.5  Draw by 3-fold repetition.
>>
>>PS: this was a strange draw since it did not seems as if there was a 3-fold
>>repetition only two to my observation, but probably the CM6000 engine new that it
>>was going to repeat the same position three times.
>>
>>Pichard.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.