Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 15:26:00 07/04/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 04, 2000 at 13:18:53, Chrille wrote: >I'm glad you like my webpage, nobody has complained about it yet >thankfully :) Unfortunately Mint is not at all as strong as Bringer >or Comet. Even the old versions I have beat it comfortably. Mint >was never designed with computer opponents in mind, it's designed >to provoke and attack to take advantage of human defensive errors. >Computers don't make that many defensive errors :( But Mint isn't >really too good at attacking anyway. It's simply too slow... No, it's definitely not as strong as Comet and Bringer, but probably somewhere around the 2000 mark alongside programs like Sjeng, ColChess and Crux. It might not be terribly strong, but the playing style is quite interesting and agressive. The facial evaluation style is something of a novelty. That feature alone makes it essential in my collection of WinBoard programs. >I think it's fun to play, speaking as a human. I'll try to challenge Mint for a game of chess when I get some spare time, but I fear I'll end up losing miserably. Best wishes... Mogens PS: BTW, nice website.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.