Author: blass uri
Date: 03:48:58 07/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 05, 2000 at 06:16:47, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On July 05, 2000 at 01:27:22, blass uri wrote: > >>On July 04, 2000 at 21:30:17, Eric Tom wrote: >> >>>Hi! >>> >>>I was thinking of buying Hiarcs but I hear there's a bug in it. Is it serious? >>>Cause I think it is an awesome engine. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Eric >> >>If you use it for playing then I believe that the bug is serious in tournament >>time control but not in faster time control(it did good results at 40/40 and at >>blitz). > >I would like to have a review of your arguments. I have a pretty big >collection of long time games with Hiarcs and I haven't noticed >anything special. But what am I to look for? Strange moves that can't >be reproduced in analysis mode? I think that you should look for all the moves that cannot be reproduced in analysis mode to see if they are better move or worse moves. You should give at least the same time as the time in the games and in part of the cases more time in order to get the same depth like the game. If you get in analysis bigger depth than the game in the same time it is probably a learning problem. If you cannot get the same move in the same iteration it is also probably a learning problem. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.