Author: Kim Hvarre
Date: 17:11:15 11/08/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 1997 at 19:28:43, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> Congratulations, Chris! > snp >Still this emulation is limited. A program that sacs and risks much can >sometimes lose much. (see games against Junior and Hydra Paris 97). > >I hope we can increase the playing strength to become a member of the >top-programs. The problem is the NPS. We need very fast machines to be >able to compete against the fast-searchers because they normally >overtake us in search-depth. So we need at least a 200 Mhz machine in >the moment. > snp I, too look forward to have CST on my hd - It's a funny thing (playing programs)it do matters how You're beaten! At the moment I (still) plays CM5000 for an enjoyable beat and Rebel9 for a qualified ditto. And no doubt that the King-engine makes mistakes, but it makes "strong ones..." In that respect, I wonder what a PII-/K6300 would do for a King-engine - perhaps risky play with "belt" as the CST? Regards, kim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.