Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 20:03:29 07/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2000 at 19:41:59, Ralf Elvsén wrote: >On July 06, 2000 at 17:09:41, walter irvin wrote: > >> what oppenings are bad for the computer?? what are the best oppenings for >>computers ?? >> have computers ever found on there own anything to add to oppening theory???? > > > >Ward - Baburin, Isle of Man open 1997 > >1. d4 d5 2. c4 dxc4 3. e4 Nc6 4. Nf3 Bg4 5. Bxc4 e6. 6. d5 exd5 7. Bxd5 > >[D]r2qkbnr/ppp2ppp/2n5/3B4/4P1b1/5N2/PP3PPP/RNBQK2R b KQkq - > >From Chris Ward's "The Queens Gambit Accepted" : > >7 ... Qf6! > >"I guess that this move had previously been rejected for two reasons. >First, it takes away an obvious square from the g8-knight, while >castling queenside on the face of it may run into Bg5. It was perhaps >not unsurprisingly then, that my opponent admitted that 'Fritz' was >largley responsible for the development of this big opening >novelty." > >It seems to be a clearly better move than e.g. Qd7 . Ward got slighly >worse and lost a tricky endgame. Sorry , for asking. But why is 7..Qf6 clearly better? Hope this isn't too off-topic..
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.