Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 20:46:20 07/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2000 at 23:43:14, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 06, 2000 at 23:40:25, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >[snip] >>Now if you show the CAP data to someone that's produced >>after >> >>1.e4,e5 2.Nf3,Nc6 3.Bb5,a6 4.Ba4,Nf6 5.O-O,b5 >> >>r1bqkb1r/2pp1ppp/p1n2n2/1p2p3/B3P3/5N2/PPPP1PPP/RNBQ1RK1 w kq b6 acd 14; acn >>101711325; ce 19; pv Bb3 Bd6 d3 Na5 Bg5 Nxb3 axb3 O-O Nc3 c6 d4 Qe7 Nxe5 >>Bxe5 dxe5 Qxe5; pm Bb3; id "C.A.P. 442898"; >> >>WASTE OF MY TIME!!!! > >The only move that would have any interest at all is the first one (the pm) >and it was played by: So now you say suddenly that i should not even take a look at the mainline but ONLY at the first move? Why produce so many ASCII then? Reduces your CAP data with at least 1/3 of its size! >Morphy >Fischer >Tal >Polgar >Keres >Kasparov >Karpov >And a host of similar "know nothings" > >In other words you have still failed to show a single example where the CAP >data "gets it wrong" after an even infantile search from one not trying very >hard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.