Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 20:57:10 07/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 06, 2000 at 23:31:25, Dave Gomboc wrote: >I think you're missing the main thrust of the CAP data. It is not intended to >be the primary criterion to decide which move is to be played. It's a lesser >factor, to be merged in with GM frequency counts, past results, and other >factors. > >If you mean "don't trust CAP data by itself", sure, I'll agree. But "don't use >CAP data" seems overly harsh to me. I think he is afraid that eventually the project will render his 'months of agonizing' as time wasted. I don't know that such will ever be the case, but I do believe at some point, with the right preprocessing, CAP data *might* be better than anything a human can produce. As Shakespear once said, "Methinks the lady dost protest too loudly."
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.