Author: Victor Valenzia
Date: 23:18:28 07/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2000 at 02:08:10, Ed Schröder wrote: >Rebel Century 2.0 needs 0:47 to see that 29.Rf6 (apparently) is bad >(+0.30 -> -0.29) but then it takes 3:43 to find a better move (29.Re3 >-0.27). The 0.02 in score difference is not exactly convincing to >refute 29.Rf6 on next iterations although Rebel keeps 29.Re3 until >ply 15 (about 15 minutes) where I stopped. > >Ed This game was played at tournament time controls, so there is a very good chance that Rebel would play Re3. I'm not a great player (only about 1800), but Re3 looks like it might lead to a draw. Victor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.