Author: blass uri
Date: 14:28:27 07/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2000 at 17:23:32, Peter Kappler wrote: >On July 07, 2000 at 16:54:45, blass uri wrote: > >>On July 07, 2000 at 16:35:37, James Robertson wrote: >> >>>On July 07, 2000 at 16:10:24, Peter Kappler wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>Agreed - Junior was winning that game. Looking forward to seeing some post >>>>mortem analysis. >>>> >>>>--Peter >>> >>>I'll start the postmortem by adding a question mark to 13. b4? >>> >>>James >> >>I agree. >> >>Maybe 13.b4 is not a losing move and it may be even one of the best move by the >>32 piece tablebases that only god knows but I see no reason for white to push >>himself to a position that he has to fight all the game for a draw. >> >>Uri > > >I'm sure Bareev would never play 13. b4?! against any human player. I can only >speculate that he had good results in a practice game against Junior with a >similar idea and decided to give it a try. > >Junior was clearly better, but didn't play incisively enough to win. I saw 3 or >4 king moves before move 50 that were typical "I don't know what to do now" >computer moves. I am not sure if Junior could win. The typical computers move are not the reason that Junior did not win because Qe2-Qc2 moves also wasted time. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.