Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:55:38 07/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2000 at 20:50:27, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On July 07, 2000 at 18:14:02, Tom Kerrigan wrote: > >>On July 07, 2000 at 18:03:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On July 07, 2000 at 17:55:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On July 07, 2000 at 17:07:59, Jerry Adams wrote: >>>> >>>>>I have heard people say that against humans processor is not that significant >>>>>after a certain speed >>>> >>>>I would simply put it this way Deep blue would have never won the match against >>>>Kasparov, using the primergy Netserver that is being used for Deep Junior. >>>> >>> >>>Rebel beat Deep Blue using a less powerful computer than the original Deep Blue. >>>Therefore, it was not the Software, but the brute power that counted the most. >> >>*sigh* >> >>You're comparing apples to airplanes (and calling them sailboats). >> >>I hope the CCC community has the... humanity... to avoid replying to your post. >> >>-Tom > >Mr Tom I was not comparig apples to airplanes ( and calling them sailboats), >around 1 year ago there was a planned commercial version of Deep Blue to be >offered for sale to the public, and they were testing it against different >People and P.C. chess softwares, of course it was using a didderent time >control; but the case in point was that Rebel played a blitz game against it and >beat it, also Chess Tiger played another Blitz game and drew against this >planned commercial version of Deep Blue, which was supposed to be on sale but >never materialized. _All_ of the above is _wrong_. They played against a web-based program that was not "deep blue" at all. It was a demo machine set up for marketing demos at the request (demand) of IBM marketing. It had _nothing_ to do with a potential commercial version, nor the version that played against Kasparov. This was all covered here before, so I assume this is intended to be a troll? ] > >PS: I understood the question perfectly, my comparison was not based on a >nonexpert opinion, I am a programmer with 15 years of experience working for >microsoft, I just have not found the time to program my own chess program, >probably due to the fact that I don't have the time that is required to write >a debugged chess program. I did not like your comments of accusing me to make a >Doesn't Follow Fallacy such as " comparing apples-and oranges" argument. > >Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.