Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 18:12:20 07/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2000 at 20:55:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 07, 2000 at 20:50:27, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 07, 2000 at 18:14:02, Tom Kerrigan wrote: >> >>>On July 07, 2000 at 18:03:43, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On July 07, 2000 at 17:55:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 07, 2000 at 17:07:59, Jerry Adams wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I have heard people say that against humans processor is not that significant >>>>>>after a certain speed >>>>> >>>>>I would simply put it this way Deep blue would have never won the match against >>>>>Kasparov, using the primergy Netserver that is being used for Deep Junior. >>>>> >>>> >>>>Rebel beat Deep Blue using a less powerful computer than the original Deep Blue. >>>>Therefore, it was not the Software, but the brute power that counted the most. >>> >>>*sigh* >>> >>>You're comparing apples to airplanes (and calling them sailboats). >>> >>>I hope the CCC community has the... humanity... to avoid replying to your post. >>> >>>-Tom >> >>Mr Tom I was not comparig apples to airplanes ( and calling them sailboats), >>around 1 year ago there was a planned commercial version of Deep Blue to be >>offered for sale to the public, and they were testing it against different >>People and P.C. chess softwares, of course it was using a didderent time >>control; but the case in point was that Rebel played a blitz game against it and >>beat it, also Chess Tiger played another Blitz game and drew against this >>planned commercial version of Deep Blue, which was supposed to be on sale but >>never materialized. > > >_All_ of the above is _wrong_. They played against a web-based program that >was not "deep blue" at all. It was a demo machine set up for marketing demos >at the request (demand) of IBM marketing. It had _nothing_ to do with a >potential commercial version, nor the version that played against Kasparov. > Mr Hyatt thank for clarifying the exact event, I was under the impression that the demo machine was using a replica of the Deep Blue. Pichard. >This was all covered here before, so I assume this is intended to be a troll? >] > > > >> >>PS: I understood the question perfectly, my comparison was not based on a >>nonexpert opinion, I am a programmer with 15 years of experience working for >>microsoft, I just have not found the time to program my own chess program, >>probably due to the fact that I don't have the time that is required to write >>a debugged chess program. I did not like your comments of accusing me to make a >>Doesn't Follow Fallacy such as " comparing apples-and oranges" argument. >> >>Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.