Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 00:25:53 07/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 07, 2000 at 20:35:17, Amir Ban wrote: >On July 07, 2000 at 14:52:29, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: > >>[Event "Dortmund Super"] >>[Site "Dortmund"] >>[Date "2000.07.07"] >>[Round "1"] >>[White "Bareev"] >>[Black "DeepJunior 6"] >>[Result "1/2-1/2"] >> >>1. c4 e6 2. Nc3 d5 3. d4 c6 4. e3 Nf6 5. b3 Nbd7 6. Bb2 Bd6 7. Nf3 O-O 8. >>Bd3 Qe7 9. O-O e5 10. Be2 e4 11. Nd2 a6 12. cxd5 cxd5 13. b4 Bxb4 14. Qb3 >>Nb8 15. Na4 Qd6 16. Rfd1 Nc6 17. Bc3 Bxc3 18. Qxc3 Bg4 19. Bxg4 Nxg4 20. >>Nf1 b5 21. Nc5 Rfc8 22. Rdc1 h5 23. Rc2 Nf6 24. Rac1 Ne8 25. a4 b4 26. Qe1 >>h4 27. h3 Qh6 28. Nb3 Rc7 29. Qe2 Raa7 30. Qg4 Kf8 31. Nfd2 Ne7 32. Rxc7 >>Rxc7 33. Nc5 Ra7 34. Ndb3 Kg8 35. Qe2 Nc7 36. a5 Nb5 37. Qd2 Nc6 38. Na4 >>Qf6 39. Rc5 Rc7 40. Qe2 g6 41. Qc2 Kg7 42. Qe2 Kh8 43. Qc2 Qd6 44. Qe2 f5 >>45. Qd1 Kh7 46. Qe2 Rf7 47. f4 exf3 48. Qxf3 Ne7 49. Qf4 Qxf4 50. exf4 Rf6 >>51. Nb6 Rd6 52. Kf2 Kh6 53. Nc8 Nxc8 54. Rxc8 Kg7 55. Ke3 Re6+ 56. Kd3 Re1 >>57. Rc1 Rxc1 58. Nxc1 Kf6 59. Na2 b3 60. Nb4 Ke6 61. Nxa6 Kd6 62. Nb4 Nxd4 >>63. Kc3 Ne2+ 64. Kxb3 Nxf4 65. a6 Kc7 66. Kc3 g5 67. Kd4 g4 68. Kc5 d4 69. >>Kxd4 Nxg2 70. Nd3 gxh3 71. Nf2 h2 72. Ke5 f4 73. Ke4 Kb6 >>1/2-1/2 > >Some comments from Dortmund: > >The game lasted 6.5 hours, ending two hours after all the other games. We ran >into Bareev and Kramnik later on a Dortmund street. Bareev admitted says he's >dead tired. > >Bareev thinks 68... d4 is a mistake and that 68... Kb8 instead wins. > >I asked him why 13. b4. He said "to confuse the computer". He overlooked and was >impressed by 14...Nb8. Boris Alterman thinks b4 is nonsense and doesn't >understand what's wrong with simpler answers like 14... Nb6 or 14... Rd8. > >The score was a roller-coaster in the later part of the game. Junior thought >that 56...Re1 is winning, then it failed low, but either there was nothing >better or timeout occurred. Later it seemed to work out anyway to a won knight >endgame, but the result was a draw. > >The game was in Bareev's typical style: all positional, no tactics whatever. He >defended very accurately in the end (but 55.Ke3 doesn't look right). > >Interesting comment: Bareev thought the computer was clearly excellent in >strategics but not so good in tactics ! Kramnik also joined in the opinion that >computers miss many tactics. > >Something to think about. > >Tomorrow Huebner. Sunday Adams. > >By the way, Junior needs 3 points to make the first computer GM norm ever. > >Amir Hi Amir, [d]6k1/2r2p2/p1n2qp1/PnRp4/Np1Pp2p/1N2P2P/2Q2PP1/6K1 b - - I don't understand 41..Kg7 as it allows 42.Nb6 (not played by Bareev). IMO after 42.Nb6 it is white having the better position after all the exchanges. Rebel analysis: 41..Kg7 (-0.56) 14 plies 41..Qd6 (+0.74) 14 plies I can't explain the 1.30 difference. What do I miss? Did Junior see something very deep or does Rebel and Junior have a total different evaluation here. Ed
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.