Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 06:43:12 07/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2000 at 09:29:54, leonid wrote: >Your number are more that curious. Probably mentioned new computer is more >speedy that I can expect. My guess was based on the nps that my AMD 400 >demonstrated around two weeks ago. Then I tried Crafty and few other programs >that goes in Hiarcs package. The number then was around 150000 as average >numbers. Not the best possible. Positions were very heavy. > >If you could send me directly one exact position (or put it here) on your >computer with its nps it will be good. I am curious to know how much we can >expect speed with our new hardware. If you will send a position, please indicate >how big was hash table. We might be talking about two different things. I used the bench command in Crafty (17.11) to reach about 485000 nps with 32Mb hash. The Coppermine should do even better. The 600000 nps estimate was a little too high, 520-540000 nps is more realistic. Best wishes... Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.