Author: blass uri
Date: 06:56:23 07/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 08, 2000 at 09:43:12, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 08, 2000 at 09:29:54, leonid wrote: > >>Your number are more that curious. Probably mentioned new computer is more >>speedy that I can expect. My guess was based on the nps that my AMD 400 >>demonstrated around two weeks ago. Then I tried Crafty and few other programs >>that goes in Hiarcs package. The number then was around 150000 as average >>numbers. Not the best possible. Positions were very heavy. >> >>If you could send me directly one exact position (or put it here) on your >>computer with its nps it will be good. I am curious to know how much we can >>expect speed with our new hardware. If you will send a position, please indicate >>how big was hash table. > >We might be talking about two different things. I used the bench command in >Crafty (17.11) to reach about 485000 nps with 32Mb hash. The Coppermine should >do even better. The 600000 nps estimate was a little too high, 520-540000 nps is >more realistic. > >Best wishes... >Mogens The question is on which position the bench command is based on. 520000-540000 seems realistic for many positions because I know that crafty does not like the AMD and prefers the pentium. Crafty on my pentiumIII450(windows98) as an engine for hiarcs shows often more than 200 nps and I think that the pIII800 may be more than twice faster(I read that it is more than twice faster for hiarcs). Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.