Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:38:38 11/09/97
Go up one level in this thread
>I have tried to explain thoses things to Mr Van den Herik before >the beginning of the Tournament. But there was nothing to do, >his decision was made long before. To justify accelerated pairing, >he said that there was a real gap between the strongest programs and >the weakest ones. After the tournament, many games prove it is not >true (between the parenthesis, the final rankings of the programs): >Stobor (24 ) won against Fritz 5 (16), Chess Tiger (27) made a draw >against Dark > Thought (6) , Chess Guru (14) won against Shredder (3), etc... >During the tournament, I have heard Mr Marsland himself say to Bruce >Moreland that the accelerated pairing was not necessary... > Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum CSTal was in the B group of programs that are not that strong ! We did not play bad as a program from the low-level-group.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.