Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: The Revenge of Michael Adams will end up in a DRAW !

Author: blass uri

Date: 10:59:47 07/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On July 09, 2000 at 10:37:40, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On July 08, 2000 at 23:45:22, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On July 08, 2000 at 17:26:26, Mark Young wrote:
>>
>>>On July 08, 2000 at 16:49:12, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>>>
>>>>After Michael Adams almost lost to Deep Junior Previously at G/60, it is obvious
>>>>that he would be the GM that has practiced the harder in order to revenge, or
>>>>erase the tragic match vs Deep Junior. He probably had practiced so many games
>>>>that he can almost played blindfold against Deep Junior by now. I predict an
>>>>easy win tomorrow by Michael Adams.
>>>>
>>>>Pichard.
>>>
>>>Someone better show the other Grandmasters how to beat Junior, and soon. Junior
>>>is only going to seem stronger as this tournament progresses, as the humans will
>>>start to tier. We know Junior must have weaknesses to anti-computer play, who
>>>will be the first to take the risk of using this weapon against Junior?
>>>
>>>If the GM's don't start playing against Junior’s weaknesses soon, the question
>>>will no longer be are computers Grandmaster, but are computers Super Grandmaster
>>>at tournament time controls.
>>
>>Not yet but as soon as there is a primergy with a least 32 processors
>>running at the speed of the latest intel Pentium 4, possibly next time around.
>>Deep Junior still have to face the best players, such as: a well prepared Adams,
>>Kramnik and Anand.
>>
>>
>I believe that Deep Junior is already a la par against the best 10 Human
>players at tournament time Control. I just wonder what it would be capable of,
>using the latest Intel Pentium 4 processors for the Primergy Netserver.
>
>>Pichard.

We are going to see.

I do not think that adams looked for a revenge.
He played quiet game and did not try to attack Junior's king.

Attacking program's king is the best way to win computers but I guess that he
was afraid to take risks.

I hope to see humans go for tactics.
kramnik said that computers are weak in tactics so we are going to see if he can
make advantage of it.

I expect now better result than 3 out of 9 for Junior.
I guess 4-4.5 out of 9 for Junior.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.