Author: Mike S.
Date: 18:01:09 07/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2000 at 11:08:41, D Ridge wrote: >Does anyone have sufficient data or experience with the above that could provide >an intelligent opinion of the relative playing strength of the Fritz 6 engine >compared to CM7000? I can only provide my impressions of Fritz 5.32 and CM 6000. There was a similar question at r.g.c.c.; I'm quoting myself as follows: I have compared CM6k, Fritz 5.32 (and several others) by test positions. At combinations, I think that CM6k, Fritz 5(.16)/5.32 and Hiarcs 7.32 are equally strong; their results were very similar. Btw., Crafty 16.6 and Little Goliath 2000a performed at the same level in this segment of the test. In 10 positional tests, the Fritz's were significantly better than the other progs mentioned (but not as good as CSTal II or Shredder 3 for example). In a small sample of 6 endgame positions (tested without tablebases), CM6k found more solutions than Fritz - but the best in this part was Crafty 16.6. I do not have the latest versions of some programs. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.