Author: Mark Young
Date: 19:00:51 07/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2000 at 13:59:47, blass uri wrote: >On July 09, 2000 at 10:37:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On July 08, 2000 at 23:45:22, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On July 08, 2000 at 17:26:26, Mark Young wrote: >>> >>>>On July 08, 2000 at 16:49:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>After Michael Adams almost lost to Deep Junior Previously at G/60, it is obvious >>>>>that he would be the GM that has practiced the harder in order to revenge, or >>>>>erase the tragic match vs Deep Junior. He probably had practiced so many games >>>>>that he can almost played blindfold against Deep Junior by now. I predict an >>>>>easy win tomorrow by Michael Adams. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard. >>>> >>>>Someone better show the other Grandmasters how to beat Junior, and soon. Junior >>>>is only going to seem stronger as this tournament progresses, as the humans will >>>>start to tier. We know Junior must have weaknesses to anti-computer play, who >>>>will be the first to take the risk of using this weapon against Junior? >>>> >>>>If the GM's don't start playing against Junior’s weaknesses soon, the question >>>>will no longer be are computers Grandmaster, but are computers Super Grandmaster >>>>at tournament time controls. >>> >>>Not yet but as soon as there is a primergy with a least 32 processors >>>running at the speed of the latest intel Pentium 4, possibly next time around. >>>Deep Junior still have to face the best players, such as: a well prepared Adams, >>>Kramnik and Anand. >>> >>> >>I believe that Deep Junior is already a la par against the best 10 Human >>players at tournament time Control. I just wonder what it would be capable of, >>using the latest Intel Pentium 4 processors for the Primergy Netserver. >> >>>Pichard. > >We are going to see. > >I do not think that adams looked for a revenge. >He played quiet game and did not try to attack Junior's king. > >Attacking program's king is the best way to win computers but I guess that he >was afraid to take risks. > >I hope to see humans go for tactics. >kramnik said that computers are weak in tactics so we are going to see if he can >make advantage of it. > >I expect now better result than 3 out of 9 for Junior. >I guess 4-4.5 out of 9 for Junior. If Junior does achieve 4 to 4.5 points in this tournament, does this in anyway justify the ratings accuracy of the SSDF list? > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.