Author: blass uri
Date: 20:29:13 07/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 09, 2000 at 22:00:51, Mark Young wrote: >On July 09, 2000 at 13:59:47, blass uri wrote: > >>On July 09, 2000 at 10:37:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On July 08, 2000 at 23:45:22, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On July 08, 2000 at 17:26:26, Mark Young wrote: >>>> >>>>>On July 08, 2000 at 16:49:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>After Michael Adams almost lost to Deep Junior Previously at G/60, it is obvious >>>>>>that he would be the GM that has practiced the harder in order to revenge, or >>>>>>erase the tragic match vs Deep Junior. He probably had practiced so many games >>>>>>that he can almost played blindfold against Deep Junior by now. I predict an >>>>>>easy win tomorrow by Michael Adams. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>>>Someone better show the other Grandmasters how to beat Junior, and soon. Junior >>>>>is only going to seem stronger as this tournament progresses, as the humans will >>>>>start to tier. We know Junior must have weaknesses to anti-computer play, who >>>>>will be the first to take the risk of using this weapon against Junior? >>>>> >>>>>If the GM's don't start playing against Junior’s weaknesses soon, the question >>>>>will no longer be are computers Grandmaster, but are computers Super Grandmaster >>>>>at tournament time controls. >>>> >>>>Not yet but as soon as there is a primergy with a least 32 processors >>>>running at the speed of the latest intel Pentium 4, possibly next time around. >>>>Deep Junior still have to face the best players, such as: a well prepared Adams, >>>>Kramnik and Anand. >>>> >>>> >>>I believe that Deep Junior is already a la par against the best 10 Human >>>players at tournament time Control. I just wonder what it would be capable of, >>>using the latest Intel Pentium 4 processors for the Primergy Netserver. >>> >>>>Pichard. >> >>We are going to see. >> >>I do not think that adams looked for a revenge. >>He played quiet game and did not try to attack Junior's king. >> >>Attacking program's king is the best way to win computers but I guess that he >>was afraid to take risks. >> >>I hope to see humans go for tactics. >>kramnik said that computers are weak in tactics so we are going to see if he can >>make advantage of it. >> >>I expect now better result than 3 out of 9 for Junior. >>I guess 4-4.5 out of 9 for Junior. > >If Junior does achieve 4 to 4.5 points in this tournament, does this in anyway >justify the ratings accuracy of the SSDF list? No The rating of the ssdf list is comp-comp rating. results of 4.5 is about 2700 performance and the ssdf rating of Junior on the hardware it play is probably 100-150 elo better. I do not buy the 2900 ssdf rating guess from kasparovchess because of diminishing return from speed but I believe that it is more than 2800 ssdf rating. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.