Author: blass uri
Date: 03:38:22 07/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 10, 2000 at 05:54:22, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >On July 10, 2000 at 04:21:25, pavel wrote: > >>On July 09, 2000 at 18:30:05, D Ridge wrote: >> >>>I’m a long-time Chess Master fan…got 5000/6000/7000. >>> >>>Decided to try Fritz 6 since I’ve heard so much about it. >>> >>>Never had such mixed feelings about a piece of software. >>> >>>I feel some of aspects of the user interface & some features are remarkable and >>>make CM seem like a toy. >>> >>>I also find some aspects of the user interface & some features completely >>>baffling! >>> >>>Maybe I’m thick but I find CM is, in general, far more intuitive to use in >>>almost every area. >>> >>>Anyone else find that? >>> >>>David >> >> >>you should understand the differance CM users and fritz users, >>CM was made mainly for the mass market with "cute interface", didnt care much >>about the program strength. though its still very strong. >>on the other hand fritz is made for serious players. for players you are more >>interested to have "good games" and analyze "serious positions" and stuff like >>that. not for novice :) >>thanks >>pavel > >This answer tells me that marketing guys at ChessBase did a good work. > >Alessandro I disagree. The answer tells me that marketing guys at mindscape did a good work. From a marketing point of view making programs for the mass market are better than programs for serious players and I guess that mindscape earns more money from chessmaster than chessbase from their engines. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.