Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 15:49:21 07/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 10, 2000 at 18:17:28, Fernando Villegas wrote: >On July 10, 2000 at 14:15:39, Terry Ripple wrote: > >>I know Hiarcs7.32 is one of the most knowledge based programs, but what about >>the famous Shredder4, Rebel Century and Junior6? Where do they average on >>knowledge in comparison? >> >>Best regards, >>terry >The point is what the question means. If A) more knowledge is more code lines >with knowledege or B) it means more variety of positions where the program pcik >a move not on the ground of sheer search but deciding accortding a positional, >knowledable criteria. Clearly are different things and even they can go on >oposite directions. A bad programmer can put into the program every conceivable >knowledge and still produces a nasty thing. And vice versa, as Morshch do, he >can put just a bare minimun and get a really outstanding program. The question >is and ever will be: which is the relevant minimum knowledge to multiply the >maximal search capabilities for the best overall result. This is like the >alchemic formula of the problem. >fernand Hi Fernando, I see your point and totally agree! There is a fine line for a programmer to deceide just how much knowledge to add before it starts directly affecting his engine's performance. If we were at the point in time where there was more than enough speed and memory for programmers to work with, then more chess knowledge put into a program would be better. I guess Fritz 6a has just the right amount of knowledge that won't slow it down too much, and thus can still look into the position deep enough. Hiarcs7.32 can't search as fast as Fritz6a but reaches the solution by using a smarter search. Regards, Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.