Author: José Antônio Fabiano Mendes
Date: 10:13:17 07/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2000 at 13:00:43, blass uri wrote: >On July 11, 2000 at 12:18:50, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On July 11, 2000 at 12:09:41, KarinsDad wrote: >> >>>Actually, I was just kidding. >> >>I know, which is why I answered :o). >> >>>However, the statistics look strange. For example, Adams and Anand have the >>>following players remaining: >>> >>>Adams Anand >>>----- ----- >>>B Anand W Adams >>> >>>W Leko W Leko >>>B Huebner B Huebner >>> >>>B Akopian 1.5 B Kramnik 2.0 >>>W Khalifman 1.5 W Deep Junior 2.5 >>> >>>Adams has already beaten Kramnik. This is Kramnik's first loss in 83 games. I >>>doubt he will lose to Anand, most likely a draw. >> >>Kramnik might not have the same level of concentration in this tournament, so I >>wouldn't be surprised if he lost to a Anand, who has gained a lot of confidence. >> >>>It appears that Adam's remaining opponents are slightly easier with the >>>exception of him having black against Anand. If he can draw that game, he can >>>possibly win the tournament. >> >>I'm hoping for Adams, especially after the nice game against Kramnik. >> >>Best wishes... >>Mogens > >I hope that adams will not win after he took advantage of internet problems to >prevent a match between Deep Junior and kasparov(in the tournament of one hour >per game). > >I also was not impressed by his win against kramnik because kramnik lost because >of a tactical mistake. > >Uri According to Leontxo García in "El País Digital",Kramnik already was in a difficult situation when he started the faulty combination. Please see: [in Spanish] JAFM http://www.elpais.es/p/d/20000711/deportes/jaque1.htm
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.