Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Could Deep Blue Have done better than D.J Using the same Primergy ?

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 19:01:13 07/11/00

Go up one level in this thread

On July 11, 2000 at 21:17:40, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>Graham Laight wrote that in 1997 Deep Blue did better than Deep Junior is doing
>now; whenever it got a significant advantage, it won against Kasparov.
>
>My answer to that comparison is that if you compare the difference in hardware
>between Deep Blue Super computer to the Primergy netserver, it is like
>comparing the Space Shuttle to a Helicopter in Speed. Deep Blue could not have
>done better against this type of opponents, using the same Primergy Netserver.

The comparison is even more pure nonesense than you are relating.

The architecture is completely different.  Deep Blue used a hardware solution.
Deep Junior is a software solution.  Apples and Oranges if there ever were any.

• Re: Could Deep Blue Have done better than D.J Using the same Primergy ? Jorge Pichard 19:22:05 07/11/00
  • Re: Could Deep Blue Have done better than D.J Using the same Primergy ? Dann Corbit 19:54:08 07/11/00
    • Re: Could Deep Blue Have done better than D.J Using the same Primergy ? Jorge Pichard 21:02:20 07/11/00
      • Re: Could Deep Blue Have done better than D.J Using the same Primergy ? Keith Ian Price 00:47:58 07/12/00
      • Re: Could Deep Blue Have done better than D.J Using the same Primergy ? Jorge Pichard 21:10:04 07/11/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.