Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 19:22:05 07/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 11, 2000 at 22:01:13, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 11, 2000 at 21:17:40, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Graham Laight wrote that in 1997 Deep Blue did better than Deep Junior is doing >>now; whenever it got a significant advantage, it won against Kasparov. >> >>My answer to that comparison is that if you compare the difference in hardware >>between Deep Blue Super computer to the Primergy netserver, it is like >>comparing the Space Shuttle to a Helicopter in Speed. Deep Blue could not have >>done better against this type of opponents, using the same Primergy Netserver. > >The comparison is even more pure nonesense than you are relating. > >The architecture is completely different. Deep Blue used a hardware solution. >Deep Junior is a software solution. Apples and Oranges if there ever were any. I was not comparing the architecture of the hardware, what I am trying to point out is that given the calculating power of the two different systems, there is a ratio of a least 200 to 1. Therefore, the advantage of using a system which is capable of calculating 200 times faster, simply indicate that Deep Blue Software was not really superior to Deep Junior, but the advantage of its calculating power will make any top Commercial software rates by SSDF play like a super GM. Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.