Author: blass uri
Date: 01:09:56 07/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2000 at 03:40:44, Ed Schröder wrote: >On July 12, 2000 at 03:16:44, blass uri wrote: > >>I read in kasparovchess.com that Junior could reproduce all the moves against >>adams in a laptop so I guess that it found Bg7 thanks to software improvements(I >>read that the commercial Deep Junior cannot find it in tournament time control) >> >>It likes Bg7 but changes its mind later and find it again only after a long >>time.(I think it was more than 2 hours) >> >>Sarah bird used only one processor for deep Junior in her test so I am not sure >>if it found Bg7 thanks to software improvements because it is possible that Deep >>Junior gets more than linear improvement by more proccesors in some positions. >> >>Uri > >What is so special on Bg7? Programs who evaluate the position black having >a (small) advantage will take a long time finding Bg7, programs who evaluate >the position as negative for black will find Bg7 quickly. Again I would like >to know why Bg7 is so much better than Re1. After 14 plies Rebel also picks >Bg7 but the score difference with Re1 is only 0.06. > >Ed I did not analyze Re1 but I read that the commercial Junior likes Rg8 and not Bg7 and I read that Rg8 is probably losing. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.