Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How to beat Rebel 9 in 16 moves!!

Author: Randolph S. Baker

Date: 07:45:51 11/10/97

Go up one level in this thread


On November 09, 1997 at 23:07:06, Robert Sherman wrote:

>On November 09, 1997 at 18:00:30, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>
>>
>>I am aware of this for years. Rebel is programmed for fast recaptures.
>>This algorithm of course has some negative side effects shown in the
>>below game which fortunately are big exceptions.
>>
>>Still I prefer to leave it the way it is now because removing the
>>algorithm would mean Rebel will think 3-5 minutes again on simple
>>recaptures. I received too many complaints about that in the past.
>>
>>Thus so now and then you are lucky :)
>>
>>- Ed Schroder -
>>
>>
>
>
>I disagree that this is a "simple recapture."  In this game there is a
>material imbalance and a positional imbalance.  The Nxc7 is a sacrifice

Furthermore, a N giving itself up for a P in any position should warrant
additional inspection. Surely anyone who volunteers material freely
might be "up to something", and the time management algorithm should
take this into account.

>that should be rejected with black easily winning.  A human would think
>if I stop the attack on my king, I win easily and take their time
>knowing that it is the most important move in the game.  Rebel 9's score
>drops almost immediately from from +8 to + 5 and Rebel's time estimation
>thinks it will take from 3 to 5 minutes.  Then all of sudden it takes
>the knight after 30 seconds of thought.  On the fixed time level it sees
>at least a draw and changes its move to Bf2+ in 45 seconds.  This move
>is a sac, not a recapture.  A simple recapture would be taking back a
>knight after bishop was captured, or an exchange of rooks, which 30
>seconds would be enough time to look for an in-between move.  Anyway,
>Rebel on the fixed time control changes its PV away from Qxc7 the second
>fastest of the many programs I have tested.  Genius is number one by
>playing d5 in what I think was 12 seconds.  Also, it is the only
>computer that would suggest the winning sac try of Nxc7, I wonder if any
>other computer would try that.  I didn't test Rebel  9 with that.

Go Hiarcs 6! On an admittedly faster computer (PII 233), Hiarcs 6
considers 9. ... Qxc7?? for a mere 4 seconds. It chooses 9. ... D5 as
the refutation, in somewhere between 15 and 30 seconds. (I was tinkering
around with the analysis, so the cache contents were speeding up times
after a while).

Also, Hiarcs finds 9. Nxc7! in 120 seconds.

Perhaps not as fast as Genius, but Hiarcs is not known for speed.

>Anyway, I really like Rebel 9 and I am happy I purchased it.  So keep up
>the good work.
>
>Robert Sherman
>
>
>>
>>>White : Robert Sherman   Black: Rebel 9
>>
>>>1. e4  e5   2. Nf3  Nc6   3. Bc4  Bc5   4. Nc3  Nc6  5. Nd5  Nxe4  6. d3
>>> Nxf2  7. Qe2  Nxh1  8. Ng5  O-O   9. Nxc7  Qxc7  10. Qh5  h6  11. Bxf7
>>>Kh8  12. Qg6  Qa5  13. c3  Qxc3  14. bc  Bf2  15. Kd1  Ne7  16. Qh7#



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.