Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 13:16:55 07/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2000 at 15:29:11, pavel wrote: >dont you think it is more likely that he has seen further than we have?...... Yes, that is likely. But it also true that Vladi is a human and humans blunder from time to time.... >come on!! with all the chess knowledge we have in this forum I doubt that we >can "always" prdict what a GM (like vladimir's) next move will be. Also true, although a troop of chess computer enthousiasts combined with strong software can produce pretty good analysis. >not to mention are we even good enough to say things like he "blundered" and >the win is "slipping out of his had? We can, but this time we (or I) were wrong. This can happen. That's the fun when watching games from aside: You easy jump to conclusions. Which makes it also interesting to read. For me it's nice to see 50 people giving their opinion about a position. >seeessssshhhh!! >wake up, he is a GM not a computer chess addict like us >pavel ;) I consider myself not only a 'chess computer addict', I play chess for 25 years and next year I'll be playing in the highest Dutch competition. Still, no GM-strength, but I know something of the game. Regards, Jeroen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.