Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 14:00:57 11/10/97
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 1997 at 16:57:06, Keith Ian Price wrote: >On November 10, 1997 at 09:56:19, Chris Whittington wrote: > >> >>To KIP (whose email I don;t have a copy of): >> >>Took a look at the TASC code earlier today; er, the detection code was >>commented out with a strange comment about setting up some variable. >> >>I hacked the code around so that this variable got initialised properly >>(?), >>and have built a new version KIPCHESS.ZIP which is now sitting on the >>Oxford Softworks web site waiting for you to download and test. I can't >>test it out, because our TASC board is dead. All I know is that the way >>the detection code has been done doesn't crash the entire system if >>there is no TASC board connected. >> >>I guess I could wriggle around with 'detects all known boards' means >>'detects all boards known to it' or whatever, but ..... :) >> >>If this version doesn't work for you, then I guess TASC support is out >>the window, sorry. >> >>Chris > >Thanks. I will download it and let you know as soon as possible. Is this >the Paris release? Yes, Paris + TASC code enabled. I rather doubt it will work though :( > Also, another question: The nps figure given on the >Tech page generally says 2500-3000 for my P150, but what I have taken to >be the total nodes processed for current ply, at the bottom, seems to >increment at 1/3 to 1/4 of that speed. Which is correct? The 2500-3000 The other figure is the maximum width of the tree, obviously the tree has some height as well, hence the smaller update rate. Chris Whittington > >Thanks again, >kp
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.