Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 22:41:49 07/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2000 at 01:27:59, Victor Valenzia wrote: >On July 12, 2000 at 19:39:37, walter irvin wrote: > >>i was testing several programs in paulsen vs morphy where morphy made the great >>sac 17. QxB .i tested several programs ,hiarcs 7.32 1 min 23 sec was the best >>.crafty 16.6 did it in 3 min 50 sec ,strangly crafty 17.10 never found it in 10 >>mins .junior 6 never found it in 18 mins!!fritz6 never found it in 3 min .all >>this was on a 300 mhz 64 meg hash .in the actual game morphy used 20 min . > >Fritz 5.32 on a PIII 500 finds it in 14 seconds. > >New position >[D]4r1k1/p1pb1ppp/Qbp1r3/8/1P6/2Pq1B2/R2P1PPP/2B2RK1 b - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 5.32: > >= (-0.16) 3...Qxa6 00:00:00 >= (-0.16) 3...Qxa6 00:00:00 >³ (-0.38) 3...Qg6 00:00:00 >= (-0.03) 3...Qg6 00:00:00 >= (-0.03) 3...Qg6 00:00:00 >= (-0.16) 3...Qxa6 00:00:00 >³ (-0.34) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 00:00:00 >³ (-0.34) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bd5 00:00:00 >³ (-0.41) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 Bc8 5.Ra1 c5 00:00:00 >= (-0.19) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 Bc8 5.Ra1 c5 6.b5 00:00:00 >= (-0.22) 3...Qg6! 00:00:00 >= (-0.22) 3...Qg6 4.d4 c5 5.d5 Bc8 6.Qc4 00:00:00 >= (-0.25) 3...Qxa6! 00:00:00 >³ (-0.28) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 Bc8 5.Ra1 00:00:00 >³ (-0.53) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Rxb6 axb6 00:00:00 >³ (-0.53) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Rxb6 axb6 00:00:00 >³ (-0.56) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Ra1 Bxf1 8.Kxf1 00:00:01 >³ (-0.47) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Ra1 Bxf1 8.bxc5 00:00:02 >³ (-0.59) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Ra1 Bxf1 8.Kxf1 00:00:07 >³ (-0.63) 3...Qxf3 00:00:14 >-+ (-1.44) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qc4+ 00:00:16 >µ (-1.22) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qf1 00:00:19 >µ (-1.19) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qf1 00:00:35 >µ (-1.16) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qc4+ 00:01:35 >-+ (-1.47) 3...Qxf3! 00:05:08 >-+ (-1.91) 3...Qxf3! 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bg2+ 8.Kg1 00:06:55 And look at that darling ce of -2 pawns. Probably found it in a database and did it because of the magnitude of the player or because it was marked with 'bm' or !!. It does not make any sense to choose that move with that horrible centipawn evaluation.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.