Author: blass uri
Date: 22:58:42 07/12/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2000 at 01:41:49, Dann Corbit wrote: >On July 13, 2000 at 01:27:59, Victor Valenzia wrote: > >>On July 12, 2000 at 19:39:37, walter irvin wrote: >> >>>i was testing several programs in paulsen vs morphy where morphy made the great >>>sac 17. QxB .i tested several programs ,hiarcs 7.32 1 min 23 sec was the best >>>.crafty 16.6 did it in 3 min 50 sec ,strangly crafty 17.10 never found it in 10 >>>mins .junior 6 never found it in 18 mins!!fritz6 never found it in 3 min .all >>>this was on a 300 mhz 64 meg hash .in the actual game morphy used 20 min . >> >>Fritz 5.32 on a PIII 500 finds it in 14 seconds. >> >>New position >>[D]4r1k1/p1pb1ppp/Qbp1r3/8/1P6/2Pq1B2/R2P1PPP/2B2RK1 b - - 0 1 >> >>Analysis by Fritz 5.32: >> >>= (-0.16) 3...Qxa6 00:00:00 >>= (-0.16) 3...Qxa6 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.38) 3...Qg6 00:00:00 >>= (-0.03) 3...Qg6 00:00:00 >>= (-0.03) 3...Qg6 00:00:00 >>= (-0.16) 3...Qxa6 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.34) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.34) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bd5 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.41) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 Bc8 5.Ra1 c5 00:00:00 >>= (-0.19) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 Bc8 5.Ra1 c5 6.b5 00:00:00 >>= (-0.22) 3...Qg6! 00:00:00 >>= (-0.22) 3...Qg6 4.d4 c5 5.d5 Bc8 6.Qc4 00:00:00 >>= (-0.25) 3...Qxa6! 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.28) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 Bc8 5.Ra1 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.53) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Rxb6 axb6 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.53) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Rxb6 axb6 00:00:00 >>³ (-0.56) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Ra1 Bxf1 8.Kxf1 00:00:01 >>³ (-0.47) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Ra1 Bxf1 8.bxc5 00:00:02 >>³ (-0.59) 3...Qxa6 4.Rxa6 c5 5.Bg4 Bb5 6.Bxe6 Rxe6 7.Ra1 Bxf1 8.Kxf1 00:00:07 >>³ (-0.63) 3...Qxf3 00:00:14 >>-+ (-1.44) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qc4+ 00:00:16 >>µ (-1.22) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qf1 00:00:19 >>µ (-1.19) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qf1 00:00:35 >>µ (-1.16) 3...Qxf3 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bxf2 8.Qc4+ 00:01:35 >>-+ (-1.47) 3...Qxf3! 00:05:08 >>-+ (-1.91) 3...Qxf3! 4.gxf3 Rg6+ 5.Kh1 Bh3 6.Qd3 f5 7.Rd1 Bg2+ 8.Kg1 00:06:55 > >And look at that darling ce of -2 pawns. > >Probably found it in a database and did it because of the magnitude of the >player or because it was marked with 'bm' or !!. > >It does not make any sense to choose that move with that horrible centipawn >evaluation. -1.91 means 1.91 pawns for black so Fritz5.32 is optimistic about the position. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.