Author: blass uri
Date: 08:20:10 07/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2000 at 11:14:08, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On July 13, 2000 at 02:21:31, Joshua Lee wrote: > >>On July 13, 2000 at 01:30:03, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>On July 13, 2000 at 01:24:59, blass uri wrote: >>> >>>>On July 13, 2000 at 01:05:06, Joshua Lee wrote: >>>> >>>>> a dual 500Mhz Machine for the SMP programs >>>>>a 1Ghz machine for those programs that are not...this should be equal in speed. >>>> >>>>Your assumption is wrong. >>>>2 processors are less than twice faster than one processor. >>> >>>A dual 600 should be about right. Also, probably a lot cheaper than the 1GHz >>>machine. >> >>I think Dann's response answers my question which was going to be then what dual >>processor system would be equal? >> >>Just as long as the ZD CPUMark scores were the same so Hardware is not the >>result of a victory like the WCCC's everybody is on the same Speed. >> >>Thankyou > > >This is the wrong way to do this. If you want equal hardware, use two 1ghz >machines. Forget the 2x600 == 1x1000 math. The purpose of SMP searching is to >go faster, not "go equal". The problem is that 2*600 is cheaper than 1*1000 and some people have not enough money for two 1ghz machines Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.