Author: ujecrh
Date: 12:56:02 07/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2000 at 15:18:53, blass uri wrote: >On July 13, 2000 at 15:06:51, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >>Since when is it not considered not proper and winning chess to play >>conservative, positional chess waiting for a mistake ? > >Who said that it is wrong? > > Deep jr's records is >>terrific in my view. > >I agree and maybe it could be even better if it did not agree to a draw in the >last game too early. You may be right but, on the other hand, the operator can hardly continue a game until near 50 moves against a GM without anything happening on the chessboard. It would probably immediately be considered as a bad behaviour against a GM. We have many examples in the past where the computer side has been critized for less reasonable reasons. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.