Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 14:05:46 07/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2000 at 08:53:22, Jari Huikari wrote:
>On July 12, 2000 at 14:02:16, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>Well you are right, but it is a proven fact that a K6-2 450MHz has much more
>>chess knowledge than a 486dx2-66MHz has.
>
>>If you don't like the above idea and don't want to consider CPU speed as being
>>part of the "knowledge", then your remark does not refute my definition...
>
>A good common definition for knowledge is hard to find. CPU speed is not
>programmed into a chess program, which the original question was about.
>
>Knowledge IMHO is some piece of information somehow included into code.
>Program knows something is good without having to do a deep search to
>find it out.
> Jari
What you are saying here is that knowledge can only be found in the evaluation
function. I think this is totally wrong. A lot of chess knowledge is in the
search itself.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.