Author: Jesus de la Villa
Date: 17:09:27 07/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2000 at 19:58:32, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 13, 2000 at 19:36:15, Jesus de la Villa wrote: > >> >>The Club Kasparov Analists said Anand made a big blonder, >>Comps analisis say the blonder was 38...Nf5, but the rest >>of the game seems like if he thinked he can at least >>draw (if not win) with the bad whites pawn structure, at >>least that was what analysts said and what we saw (hard end >>to Kramnik). >> >>The computers said there was other options to Nf5(~-2.00) >>like Kg8 (~0.00). >> >>Big blunder (?) or Big Anands end Knowledge. >> >>¿Would a computer win that ending Vs Anand? > >I think Anand was trying to take advantage of Kramniks time trouble, hoping that >he would make a blunder. Anand had more than 35 (!) minutes to spare at the time >control. Kramnik had less than one if the Java applet is to be trusted. > >Best wishes... >Mogens Then you think he didn't blonder, he just bed for the complex end+time vs bad structure & time pressure. This means we have to know the timing to guess if what you think is posible. This is assuming the java applet tells the true (Is easier that I can win that end to Kramnik than the Club Kasparovs applet works fine). So, there are many chances you are wrong !!!. Thanks for your comment.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.