Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:23:06 07/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 13, 2000 at 15:56:02, ujecrh wrote: >On July 13, 2000 at 15:18:53, blass uri wrote: > >>On July 13, 2000 at 15:06:51, Wayne Lowrance wrote: >> >>>Since when is it not considered not proper and winning chess to play >>>conservative, positional chess waiting for a mistake ? >> >>Who said that it is wrong? >> >> Deep jr's records is >>>terrific in my view. >> >>I agree and maybe it could be even better if it did not agree to a draw in the >>last game too early. > >You may be right but, on the other hand, the operator can hardly continue a game >until near 50 moves against a GM without anything happening on the chessboard. >It would probably immediately be considered as a bad behaviour against a GM. > >We have many examples in the past where the computer side has been critized for >less reasonable reasons. > >> >>Uri Computers will be criticized no matter what. Frans was criticized for offering a draw when the opponent was likely going to lose on time. You just can't win, no matter what you do, when it involves a computer. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.