Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Fritz 5.32 vs Hiarcs 7.32 - Which is better?

Author: blass uri

Date: 22:27:07 07/13/00

Go up one level in this thread

On July 14, 2000 at 00:56:55, Peter Skinner wrote:

>The SDDF has Fritz 5.32 rated above Hiarcs... is it stronger? Hiarcs uses
>tablebases.. wouldn't that make it stronger? Or is Fritz 5.32 really that
>strong?

Hiarcs has a learning bug at long time control and I guess that it is the reason
that it has problems at long time controls.

I saw cases when mistakes of hiarcs in games could not be reproduce manually if
you give hiarcs only the position that it blundered but the same mistakes can be
reproduced manually when you play a game with the same moves against it.

Uri

• Re: Fritz 5.32 vs Hiarcs 7.32 - Which is better? Terry Ripple 22:40:13 07/13/00
  • Re: Fritz 5.32 vs Hiarcs 7.32 - Which is better? blass uri 23:30:17 07/13/00
• Re: Uri, how long a time control would affect Hiarcs play? (NT) Terry Ripple 22:35:53 07/13/00
  • Re: Uri, how long a time control would affect Hiarcs play? (NT) blass uri 23:37:56 07/13/00
• Re: Fritz 5.32 vs Hiarcs 7.32 - Which is better? Terry Ripple 22:33:09 07/13/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.