Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 22:33:09 07/13/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2000 at 01:27:07, blass uri wrote: >On July 14, 2000 at 00:56:55, Peter Skinner wrote: > >>The SDDF has Fritz 5.32 rated above Hiarcs... is it stronger? Hiarcs uses >>tablebases.. wouldn't that make it stronger? Or is Fritz 5.32 really that >>strong? > >Hiarcs has a learning bug at long time control and I guess that it is the reason >that it has problems at long time controls. > >I saw cases when mistakes of hiarcs in games could not be reproduce manually if >you give hiarcs only the position that it blundered but the same mistakes can be >reproduced manually when you play a game with the same moves against it. > >Uri Hi Uri, The question is if it is enough games to make any difference! In the case between Fritz5.32 and Hiarcs7.32 it probaly would, because of only 28 points difference between them. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.