Author: blass uri
Date: 05:17:46 07/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 14, 2000 at 08:09:05, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On July 14, 2000 at 07:56:49, blass uri wrote: > >>The question if Akopian is faster than Fritz6 is irrelevant and the only >>question is if Deep Junior is fast enough not to blunder. > >Exactly, just as irrelevant as the speed difference between Deep Junior and >Junior. It's not comparable to the actual encounter, so your original reasoning >is irrelevant. The speed difference between Deep Junior and Junior is relevant because Junior can lose the game and maybe can lose also against akopian(I do not know) and it is not clear if Deep Junior can lose the game. If it cannot lose the game it also cannot lose against akopian and if it can lose the game then we do not know if it could lose against akopian. > >>Junior6a was not fast enough not to blunder against Fritz6a in 1 hour/game but >>from looking in the position I am sure that white is not losing objectively and >>I believe that I can draw the final position against Fritz6a in 1 hour/game not >>because I am faster than Junior6a but because I am smarter than this thing in >>the final position and I xcan play it only in order not to lose. > >It's a draw, unless either side tries to force a breakthrough in the pawn >structure. I agree. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.